Updated · Built and checked by the PlinzoTools team, formulas tested against published sources
Compare the after-tax retirement value of a Traditional (pre-tax) vs. Roth (after-tax) contribution.
This tool compares the after-tax value at retirement of the same pre-tax contribution amount, invested either in a Traditional account (grows tax-deferred, taxed at withdrawal) or a Roth account (contributes only the after-tax portion up front, grows and withdraws tax-free). The standard rule of thumb: Traditional tends to win if your tax rate will be lower in retirement than it is now; Roth tends to win if it'll be higher. The result depends entirely on the tax rates you enter -- nobody can predict future tax rates with certainty, so treat this as a sensitivity check under your own assumptions, not a guaranteed outcome.
Enter your contribution amount, your current tax rate, your estimated tax rate in retirement, an expected annual return, and years until withdrawal. Both scenarios' after-tax value appear side by side.
The calculator uses the standard same-pre-tax-dollar comparison. It grows a single contribution over your stated number of years at a steady annual return. On the Traditional side, the full pre-tax amount grows and is then reduced by your assumed retirement tax rate. On the Roth side, you first pay tax at your current rate, so only the after-tax remainder is invested, and that grows with no further tax.
Traditional after tax = contribution x (1 + return)^years x (1 - retirement rate). Roth after tax = contribution x (1 - current rate) x (1 + return)^years.
A useful consequence: the growth factor appears on both sides, so it cancels out of the comparison. The winner depends only on whether your retirement rate is lower or higher than your current rate. If the two are equal, the results tie; if your retirement rate is lower, Traditional comes out ahead; if higher, Roth does. The return and years inputs change the dollar amounts but not which side wins.
Using 6,000 dollars, a 22 percent current rate, a 12 percent retirement rate, 7 percent return and 25 years: the growth factor is about 5.43. Traditional: 6,000 x 5.43 = about 32,600, times 0.88 leaves about 28,700. Roth: 6,000 x 0.78 = 4,680, times 5.43 is about 25,400. Traditional wins by roughly 3,300 dollars in this scenario. Switch the retirement rate to 22 percent and the two land at the same figure; set it to 30 percent and Roth pulls ahead.
The most common error is entering an average or effective rate rather than a marginal one. Your current marginal rate is the tax on your next dollar of income; look at your latest return or a paycheck-based estimate. For retirement, think about expected income sources rather than simply assuming a lower number. Someone with a large pension, rental income and Social Security may not fall into a lower bracket than during their working years. Run the tool with a range, such as 10, 15 and 22 percent, to see how sensitive the outcome is.
This is a simplified educational model, not personalized tax advice; a tax professional or fiduciary planner can assess your full situation.
Mathematically, when your tax rate is identical now and at withdrawal, taxing the contribution up front (Roth) or the withdrawal (Traditional) produces the same after-tax result -- the tax is just applied at a different point in an otherwise identical calculation.
Nobody can predict this with certainty -- many people split contributions between both account types specifically to hedge against uncertainty about future tax rates and legislation.
The same growth factor multiplies both sides in this model, so it cancels out when comparing them. Only the current and retirement tax rates decide the winner; return and years change the size of the amounts.
Use your marginal rate, meaning the rate on your next dollar of income, for both fields. Effective (average) rates understate the tax effect of an extra contribution.
No. Employer match dollars are a separate item and are commonly treated as pre-tax; use the employer match calculator to size that piece.
Many plans allow it, and the tool can be run once per portion. Splitting can reduce the risk of guessing your future tax rate wrongly.
Reference: Social Security Administration